Sri Nalin Deepchand Bagmar v. lAKSHMI Vilas Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 670/2021 & IA 671/2021
in
A.IR:210/2021
Nalin Deepchand Bagmar ... Appellant Vs A.O.,Lakshmi Vilas Bank & Anr ... Respondents
... Respondents
23/05/2022
Learned Counsel Mr. Jaishankar representing Mr. V.Mohan for Petitioner/Appellant and Ms. Ananda Gomathy for Respondent No.1 Bank are present.
Notice taken to Respondent No.2 returned with an endorsement “unclaimed”.
Petitioner is to take substituted service for Respondent No.2 by way of paper publication one in English and another in vernacular, where Respondent No.2 is residing.
List the case on 29.06.2022, for filing Proof of paper publication for Respondent No.2 and Counter to IA 670/2021 (Substitution) by Respondent No.1 Bank.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nalin Deepchand Bagmar
- respondent
A.O., Lakshmi Vilas Bank
- respondent
Respondent No.2
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court