Sri Nata Krishna Parua v. Uco Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 704 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 566 of 2022 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
23.12.2022 Nata Krishna Parua … Appellant -VsUCO Bank … Respondent
Mr. A.K. Dhandhania with Mr. Somnath Roy Chowdhury, Ms. Arpita Chowdhury and Mr. Proshit Deb, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Appeal is admitted. Regular appeal number be given.
Caveat is filed on behalf of Respondent. Notice has been served upon the Respondent Bank and Affidavit-of-service to that effect has been filed. Despite service no one appears to represent the Bank.
An amount of Rs.38,80,265.00 has been deposited by the Appellant as pre deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nata Krishna Parua
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court