Remanded

Smt Indira Srinivas Mawle v. State Bank of India

DRAT5 Aug 2022REGULAR APPEAL/196/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge DRT at Kolkata adjourned an appeal listed for hearing. The respondent appeared pro se and failed to engage counsel for related appeals. The court directed a specific listing date and prohibited further adjournments unless represented by counsel.

What did the court decide?

Matter listed on 26th August 2022 with direction that no further adjournment allowed unless respondent is represented by counsel.

Smt Indira Srinivas Mawle versus State Bank of India — Service and Employment | DRAT (2022)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA

¶2

(Appeal No. 196 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 303 of 2013 in DRT-1,Hyderabad)

¶3

THE HON’BLEMR.	JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIV CHAIRPERSO	ASTAV N	A
05.08.2022	Indira Srinivas	Mawle …	Appellant
	State Bank of Others	Vs. India	(SARB) &
	s Mr. Abhishek representing Appellant	…R Mawle, his	espondent in person Mother/
	Mr. P.K. Mu Counsel for the	kherjee Respon	, Learned dent.

¶4

THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :

¶5

This is an appeal of 2018 against the interim order passed by the DRT-1, Hyderabad. It appears that due to pendency of this Appeal, Learned DRT is not proceeding further in the O.A. On the last date, Sri Abhishek Mawle who appeared for his mother and brother in two connected appeals,submitted that he will engage some lawyer by the next date of hearing. But today again he is appearing for the Appellant alone without engaging any lawyer in the matter of Appeal No. 201 of 2018 and Appeal No. 196 of 2018. No authority is filed by Sri Abhishek Mawle to represent his mother or brother. Although the Appeal should be dismissed on this ground itself but, in the interest of justice, the matter be listed on 26^th August, 2022 with a specific direction that no further adjournment shall be granted either to appear in person to argue the matter or they should be represented

¶6

through some Counsel. In case arguments are not made, Appeal shall

¶7

be decided on merits.

¶8

(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J)

¶9

Chairperson

¶10

Dated: 5^th August, 2022 8/tp

Smt Indira Srinivas Mawle v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Indira Srinivas Mawle v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Punjab National Bank versus Bolin Chetia

State Bank of India and Anr. versus Indian Bank and Anr.

Sumanta Sahu versus Indian Bank and Anr.

Abhsishek Mawle versus State Bank of India

Abhijeet Mawle versus State Bank of India Sarb and Ors.

Divyanjali Electricals Pvt. Ltd. versus Union Bank of India