The Tribunal allowed a sub judice application to substitute the Appellant Vijaya Bank with Bank of Baroda, its successor on merger, and ordered the amendment within two weeks.
Application for substitution allowed; amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I A No. 277/2022(Substitution Application)
In
Appeal No. 186/2008
Between
Vijaya Bank … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Ashish Kanojia, i/b M/s. PRS Legal, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Priyanka, i/b M/s. R.J. Singh & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Shravan Avasthi along with Mr Prashant Pandit, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 17/10/2022:-
I.A. No. 277/2022 is an application for substitution of the Appellant Vijaya Bank with Bank of Baroda into which it has merged.
Respondent Bank is present and has no objections. The application is formal in nature and hence allowed.
The amendment shall be carried out within two weeks.
Post on 23.11.2022 before the Registrar for carrying out amendment.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-18
1
Vijaya Bank
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
