The DRTA allowed an appeal challenges by an auction purchaser, condoning the delay to file the challenge in light of the Supreme Court's indefinite suspension of limitation periods order.
Condoned delay for filing appeal and accepted the appeal on file for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I A No. 136/2022 (CoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 180/2022
Between
Mr. Deepak Mhatre … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr Ganesh Narkhede, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Amita Dutta, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 17/10/2022:-
1
saving of the limitation. That period starts from 15.03.2020 to 28.03.2022 and this instant case has been filed during that period. Therefore, it would squarely apply to the instant case and therefore, the delay is condoned.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-20
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 03 of 2020 dated 27.04.2021Referred¶9
Deepak Mhatre
Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ashok Menon
Parties & counsel
