Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. Rukunuddin G Sheikh
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/172/2014
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 193/2022 (Amendment)
IN
Appeal No. 172/2014
Between
Dena Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Rukunuddin G. Sheikh & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/by M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co. Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Kushal Sawant, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Prashant Pandit, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, i/by M/s. T. N. Tripathi & Co. Advocate for Respondent No. 6.
-: Order dated : 08/06/2022 :-
I.A. No. 193/2022 is for substituting the Appellant Dena Bank with the Bank of Baroda, since the former bank has merged with the later.
The application is allowed. The Appellant is directed to carry out necessary amendment at the earliest.
Post on 20.06.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-11
1
Dena Bank
Rukunuddin G. Sheikh & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court