Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. Rukunuddin G Sheikh
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/172/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This grant of time for power of attorney
What did the court decide?
None
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal No. 172/2014
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s.
Rukunuddin G. Sheikh & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A. R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Kushal Sawant, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Prashant Pandit, a/w Mr. Jay Pandit, Advocate for Respondent 4.
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, i/b M/s. T. N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.6.
-: Order dated: 20/06/2022 :-
It is submitted that the Power of Attorney of the fourth Respondent who has filed the vakalatnama, has expired.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the fourth Respondent seeks
time for filing fresh Power of Attorney along with Vakalatnama.
The same shall be done within two weeks.
Post on 29.07.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-29
1
1 issue framed by the court
Efficiency
Bank of Baroda
Rukunuddin G. Sheikh
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court