Dismissed
Uttam Holding Limited v. Asset Reconstruction Co.(I) Ltd. & Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/166/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 166/2014
Between
Uttam Holding Ltd. … Appellant/s
V/s.
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. & 4 Ors. … Respondent/s Mr Priyansh Jain, i/b M/s. Apex Law Partners, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr Sachin Kaikini, Advocate for Respondent No.3 and 4.
-: Order dated: 12/09/2022: -
There has been no appearance for the Appellant and the learned counsel who appeared for the Appellant had withdrawn the Vakaltanama on 05.07.2022 by filing a Pursis for the reason that the Appellant was not responding to him and he has not got any instructions. Hence, the Appellant was granted time to engage another counsel and prepare for the hearing.
When the matter is taken up today for hearing, neither the Appellant nor their counsel is present.
The Appeal is of the year 2014. I assume that the Appellant is not keen on proceeding with the Appeal.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Chairperson
dpj-5
1
Uttam Holding Ltd.
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court