The Delhi Bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for hearing on a subsequent date after setting non-appearing respondents ex-parte.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 166/2010
Between
The Administrator of the Specified Undertaking … Appellant/s of the Unit Trust of India V/s. Mahakali Flyover Co. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Ruchita K. Jain, i/b M/s. MDP & Partners, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. S. P. Mogre, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Ms. Mitali Adukia, i/b M/s. M. K. Ambalal & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.5.
-: Order dated : 06/06/2022 :-
All the Respondents have been served.
Except Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 the rests have not appeared, hence they are set ex-parte.
Respondent No.3 has already filed reply.
The learned counsel appearing for Appellant seeks time.
The parties are directed to get ready for hearing on the next date, positively.
Post on 11.07.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-20
1
The Administrator of the Specified Undertaking (Unit Trust of India)
Mahakali Flyover Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
