In Regular Appeal No. 160/2016, the court listed the case for hearing on 23.03.2023 as contents of vakalatnama were not filed yet and the learned counsel for appellant sought time and contended that pleadings were complete.
Case listed for hearing on 23.03.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 160/2016 Date: 14.12.2022
Dhananjay Kumar Singh Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Karunanidhi Pandey, counsel for the respondent no. 3,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to file his vakalatnama.
It is contended that the pleadings are complete, therefore, the case may be listed for hearing.
List this case on 23.03.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the case should be listed for hearing having regard to the completeness of pleadings.
Dhananjay Kumar Singh
State Bank of India & Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
