Court granted additional time to the appellant for filing rejoinder and allowed response to an intervention filed by an advocate.
Time granted for filing rejoinder and response to intervention application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 15/2022 Date: 15.09.2022
UCO Bank Vs. M/s Asha Oil Ind. & Anr.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Praveen Chaturvedi, counsel for the appellant, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondents,
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks further time to file rejoinder, which may be filed by the next date.
The record shows that Shri Shubham, Advocate has filed an intervention application being I.A. No. 244/2022.
Let the appellant file response to the said application, if so desired, by the next date.
List this case on 15.12.2022 for rejoinder.
VN Giri
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
UCO Bank
M/s Asha Oil Ind.
Shri Shubham
VN Giri
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
