This order records the non-filing of a reply by the respondent and decides that the filing of a rejoinder is not necessary in Appeal No. 141/2012 at the Mumbai DRAT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 141/2012
Between
Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Sima Hotels and Resort Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Madhur Rai along with Mr. Ashish Pyasi & Mr. Mukul B., i/b M/s. PRS Legal, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 17/11/2022:-
There is no representation for the Respondents. Respondent No. 6 had undertaken to file a reply on the last date of the hearing but no such reply has been filed
Therefore, the filing of a rejoinder is also not necessary. It is recorded that there is no reply for the Respondent.
Post on 19.01.2023 for hearing.
Chairperson
psa-06
1
Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
Sima Hotels and Resort Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
