The tribunal dismissed the appeal for being time-barred after dismissing a default application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
I.A. 446 of 2019
And I.A. 447 of 2019 In
(Diary No. 104 of 2019)
(Arising out of S.A. 308 of 2014 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.04.2022 Paluri Appalanarasayya … Appellant
-vs-
State Bank of India
… Respondent
None for Appellant
Mr. Sooudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the second round.
This appeal is filed with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. None appears to press the application. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay, being I.A. 446 of 2019, stands dismissed in default.
In view of the above, the appeal, being Diary No. 104 of 2019, also stands dismissed; being time barred.
All pending I.A.s accordingly stand dismissed; being infructuous. File be sent to Record Room.
Copy of the order be uploaded in the website of this Tribunal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 6th April, 2022 01/ac
Paluri Appalanarasayya
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
