P N Naidu v. Punjab National Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 14/2021
Between
Mr. Pandiyan Nallakannu Naidu & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, …Respondent/s Ahmedabad
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b M/s. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Appellants.
Ms.Asha Bhuta, i/b M/s. Bhuta & Associates, Advocate for the Respondent No.
Mr Navnit Arora, Advocate for Respondent No.2
-: Order dated: 29/08/2022:-
Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant and Ld. Counsel for the Respondents further today.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants submits that the OTS scheme was produced under a sealed cover before the Tribunal and that the Appellants herein had the opportunity to inspect the same but have not come up with any offer. That OTS scheme is not before this Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Pandiyan Nallakannu Naidu & Anr.
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court