State Bank of India v. Smt Vudem Devendram
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal noted that the respondent failed to appear and adjourned the matter. No substantive decision was rendered in this brief order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 137 of 2018)
(Arising out of O.A. 363 of 2013 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.04.2022 State Bank of India … Appellant -vsSmt. Vudem Devendramma … Respondent Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Appellant None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Ms. Mekhala Kanji appears for Appellant Bank but none is present to represent the Respondent.
The matter stands adjourned for the day. Be it noted on the next date if the Respondent fails to appear, the matter shall be decided in absence of the Respondent.
List the matter on 11th May, 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 22nd April, 2022 09/ac
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Smt. Vudem Devendramma
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court