Canara Bank v. Dr Golagani Ashok Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal neither accepted nor rejected an appeal under S. 18 SFAESA 2002. Directed the appellant to inform the Tribunal about the status of a pending writ petition in the Andhra Pradesh High Court before hearing the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.2/2022 Date:30/03/2022
Canara Bank………...Appellant
Vs.
Dr. Golagani Ashok Kumar & ors ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Ms. Aparajita Ghosh.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Canara Bank against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT, Visakhapatnam. Application fees of Rs.50,205/- vide T.R. no.115429 dt. 10.01.2022 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Ms. Aparajita Ghosh.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation but a petition for condonation of delay is filed along with this application.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to entertain an appeal filed outside the limitation period pending before the High Court.
Whether to condone the delay in filing the appeal application.
Whether to proceed with the appeal pending the outcome of a parallel writ petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Dr. Golagani Ashok Kumar & ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court