Smt Pinki Gupta v. Syndicate Bank and Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 130 of 2017)
(Arising out of T.S..A. 161 of 2015 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
28.7.2022 Smt. Pinky Gupta … Appellant -VsSyndicate Bank & 7 Others … Respondents
None for Appellant
Ms. Tutul Das Singh, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2and 3/ Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
It appears necessary amendment regarding merger of the Bank has not been carried out in the Memo of Appeal. Appellant is directed to carryout necessary amendment in the nomenclature of the appeal with regard to Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3.
Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 is present.
List on 28th September, 2022.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Pinky Gupta
- respondent
Syndicate Bank & 7 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court