Indian Bank v. M/S Vidhata Rice Mill and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed for adjournment as the respondent's counsel is indisposed and requires a further appearance date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 12/2021 Date: 20.12.2022
Indian Bank Vs. M/s Vidhata Rice Mill and Ors.
Present: Shri A. K. Srivastava, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the respondent-Borrower, Shri Umesh Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ram Kaushik, counsel for the respondent no. 4,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Ram Kaushik is indisposed today, therefore, he is unable to appear today, hence prays for adjournment.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he shall comply with the order dated 27.09.2022 of this Tribunal by the next date.
As prayed, list this case on 01.03.2023 for hearing.
Anupam
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indian Bank
- respondent
M/s Vidhata Rice Mill and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court