The Delhi Tribunal dismissed the appeal for default due to lack of response from the appellant and failed service of notice on respondents.
The appeal was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 113/2017
Between
The State of Maharashtra, Sales Tax … Appellant/s Department, Aurangabad V/s.
Bank of Maharashtra &Ors.
…Respondent/s
There is no representation for the Appellant continuously for the last several postings. The Appeal is filed on 11.05.2012. The matter has been adjourned from time to time for taking steps to serve the notice on the Respondents. Notice has not yet been served on the Respondents despite opportunities given.
I assume that the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the Appeal. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-1
1
The State of Maharashtra
Bank of Maharashtra
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
