Appeal against dismissal of a stay application became infructuous due to default by the respondent. The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to want of prosecution by respondent regarding the underlying stay application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 108/2015
Between Mrs. Rekha Bhagirath Shah & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. …Respondent/s
Ms. Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated : 04/04/2022 :-
There is no representation for Appellant.
Learned counsel for Respondent submits that S.A. No. 629/2016 on the file of D.R.T.-II, Mumbai (S.A. No. 251/2015 on the file of D.R.T.-III, Mumbai) was dismissed by order dated 21.02.2022 for want of prosecution by Ld. P.O., D.R.T.-II, Mumbai.
In view of above facts, this Appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-5
1
Mrs. Rekha Bhagirath Shah & Ors.
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
