Prashant Khemka v. SBI
Case brief
What is this about?
Circular order noting defects in an S. 18 appeal application under SARFAESI Act. Tribunal directed appellant to cure deficiencies like fee payment and authentication within 15 days before considering the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Direction to remove defects within 15 days.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.232/2017 Date:08/04/2022
Prashant Khemka………...Appellant
Vs.
State Bank of India & ors. ……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ajit Keshari .
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Prashant Khemka against the order dt. 07.04.2017 in SA-71/2017 passed by the Hon’ble Presiding Officer, DRT -3, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.205/- vide T.R. no.111002 dt. 14.09.2017 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Ajit Keshari .
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is filed not within the period of Limitation but accompanied with condonation for delay petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application filed under section 18 Satya is maintainable given the defects noted such as deficit fees and authentication issues.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prashant Khemka
- respondent
State Bank of India & ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090002322017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court