Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr. v. M/S Krishna Agro Products and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order listing banking recovery appeal for service of notice to respondent no. 4 and time for filing reply.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 427/2019 Date: 08.03.2022
Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr. Vs. M/s Krishna Agro Products and Ors.
Present: Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellants-Bank, Shri Saurabh Pandey, counsel for the respondents no. 1 to 3,
Reply on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 3 has been filed. Copy of the same has been served to the counsel for the appellants today, who prays for time to file rejoinder. Let the same be filed by the next date.
The office report dated 07.03.2022 reveals that application for condonation of delay is pending for consideration and no one appears on behalf of the respondent no. 4. The record shows that the notice sent to the respondent no. 4 has not returned back. Let the fresh steps be taken by the appellant within a week for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4 by two modes i.e. Registered Post with A.D. and Speed Post. Affidavit of service be filed by the next date.
List this case on 04.07.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Application for condonation of delay pending; service of notice to respondent no. 4 required.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr.
- respondent
M/s Krishna Agro Products and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090004272019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court