Disposed
V Nithya Lakshmi v. Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Limited
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No substantive decision. The appellant failed to file the Statement of Objects and Reasons (POS), leading to a call for the next hearing date before the Chairperson.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
IA 455/2021 In A.IR:58/2021
¶3
V.Nithya Lakshmi & Ors V/S Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Limited
¶4
29/07/2022
¶5
No representation from Appellant.
¶6
POS is not filed yet despite considerable time given.
¶7
Call on 25/08/2022 before Hon’ble Chairperson.
¶8
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
V.Nithya Lakshmi & Ors
- respondent
Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090000582021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court