Ms Vasantha Surgical Equipments v. State Bank Of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata directed service of condonation of delay, waiver from pre-deposit, and appeal memo upon the respondent bank and set dates for opposition, rejoinder, and disposal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 273 of 2018
(Arising out of S.A. 1115 of 2017 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
25.11.2022 M/s. Vasantha Surgical Equipments … Appellant -VsState Bank of India … Respondent Mr. Nimish Mishra with Mr. Ankit Chatterjee, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. Sharmistha Pal led by Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/ Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that copies of application for condonation of delay, being Application No. 355 of 2018, and application for waiver from making pre deposit, being Application No. 356 of 2018 as well as Memo of Appeal have to be served upon Respondent.
Accordingly let copies of Application for condonation of delay, being Application No. 355 of 2018, application for waiver from making pre deposit, being Application No. 356 of 2018, as well as Memo of Appeal be served upon Respondent within a week.
Opposition be filed within four weeks with advance copy to the Appellant; rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Vasantha Surgical Equipments
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090002732018
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court