Ms Anukul Bhandar v. Bank of Baroda and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata dismissed the appeal in default Diary No. 55 of 2020 on 08.08.2022 as the appellant failed to appear in the second round hearing. The court vacated interim orders, closed pending interim applications, and consigned the file to the record room.
What did the court decide?
Appeal (Diary No. 55 of 2020) stood dismissed in default. Pending I.A.s closed. Interim orders vacated. File consigned to Record Room.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 55 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 91 of 2017 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
08.08.2022
M/s. Anukul Bhandar
… Appellant
-Vs-
Bank of Baroda & 4 Others … Respondents
None for Appellants
Mr. Dipanjan Datta with Mr. Subhojit Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the second round.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Anukul Bhandar
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & 4 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090000552020
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court