Mr Satish Kumar v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order directs the appellant's counsel to re-serve summons with proper postal tracking reports and file a fresh affidavit of service, as the previously submitted receipts were found defective.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY No./29/2020, Date. 05/09/2022
M Satish Kumar &Anr. ………….. Appellants
V/s.
Canara Bank &Ors.………….Respondents
Ld. Counsel Mr. Nemani Srinivas appears for appellants.
None appears for respondents.
Ld. Counsel for appellants was directed to file affidavit of service long back. He files affidavit of service today annexing postal receipts dated 27.02.2020.
It is observed from service report that the date of postal receiptsare too old and postal tracking reports are not been attached to the report. Hence he is directed to serve summons again and file affidavit of service of summons afresh.
The matter is posted on 20.09.2022 for filing of affidavit of service.
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M Satish Kumar & Anr.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court