Mr Bikash Sharma v. Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order recording objection regarding non-impleadment of Authorized Officer and listing for hearing of amendment application along with the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 43 of 2022)
(Arising out of O.A. 209 of 2019 in DRT-1, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
26.07.2022 Bikash Sharma … Appellant -VsHousing Development Finance Corporation Limited … Respondent Mr. Moti Sagar Tiwari with Mr. Ajit Keshari, Learned Counsel for Appellant Mr. Nimish Mishra, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
At the very outset, Learned Counsel for Respondent has raised objection about the maintainability of the appeal as the Authorised Officer of the Bank has not been impleaded as a party.
Appellant is at liberty to move an application for amendment at his own risk; copy whereof be served upon the Respondent. Objection, if any, be filed before the next date of listing.
List on 30th August, 2022 for hearing of the amendment application, if any moved, along with the appeal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bikash Sharma
- respondent
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 191090000432022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court