Mohammad Umar v. Punjab and Sind Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 624/2022
(Mohammad Umar Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank)
Date: 13.09.2022
Shri Abhishek Shukla, holding brief of Shri K.K. Tiwari, Ld. Counsel and files Vakalatnama on behalf of appear Respondent-Bank.
The instant Appeal was filed by Shri Harsh Chopra, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Today, Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Ld. Counsel appears and files fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of the Appellant. Ld. Counsel also files certified copy of impugned order dated 26.08.2022.
No pre deposit has been made. Waiver Application has been filed. It has been stated that the property has been sold by Bank. Ld. Counsel states that he will argue this point before Hon’ble Court.
The instant Appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against interim order dated 26.08.2022 of DRT, Lucknow in S.A. No. 513/2021. Urgency Application (I.A. No. 346/2022) Waiver Application (I.A. No. 347/2022) and Stay Application (I.A. No. 348/2022 have been filed along with the Appeal.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 16.09.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohammad Umar
- respondent
Punjab & Sind Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090006242022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court