Default dismissal by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai of a miscellaneous application for restoration of an appeal where the appellant was absent and no representation was filed.
M.A. No. 96/2021 dismissed for default; miscellaneous application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson M. A. No. 96/2021 In
(Appeal No. 93/2019- Disposed of)
Between
Mr. Jyotirmai Surendranath Gupta … Appellant/s V/s.
Karnataka Bank Ltd. … Respondent/s
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated: 10/10/2022:-
There is no representation for the Applicant/Appellant.
The restoration of M.A. No. 96/2021 has been pending for some time. The Respondent has already been set ex-parte.
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing on this M.A. No. 96/2021 for restoration of Appeal, none appears for the Applicant/Appellant.
I assume that the Appellant is not keen on proceeding with the Appeal or the Application.
Hence, the M.A. No. 96/2021 is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-22
1
Jyotirmai Surendranath Gupta
Karnataka Bank Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
