In a default order, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal filed in person as the appellant failed to appear despite multiple listings, including the current hearing.
Appeal dismissed in default for non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA (Appl. No. 64 of 2018) (M.A. No. 01 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 142 of 2015 in DRT –3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON.
Sri Rudra Bhattacharya & Anr.
…. Appellants
Vs.
Bank of India & Anr.
…… Respondents
None for the appellant.
Mr. R.C.Prusti, ld. Counsel with Mr. Sanjeev Das, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the third round of revised list. Appellant who appears in person is not present. Learned counsel for the bank is present. Even on the last two dates i.e. 14.09.2022 and 08.09.2022 appellant was not present. However, matter was listed today to give him an opportunity of hearing. Even today appellant is not present.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be sent to the parties and concerned DRT and be also be uploaded in the website of this Tribunal.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson.
Dated : 20th September, 2022 13/PKB
Sri Rudra Bhattacharya & Anr.
Bank of India & Anr.
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
