Bank of Baroda v. Maa Ganga Modern Husking Rice Mill Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications admitted. Respondent granted two weeks time to file objections and to list the matter for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks time granted to the Respondent to file objections.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 508 of 2022) (Arising out of S.A. No. 120 of 2022 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 20.09.2022 | Bank of Baroda & Anr |
|---|---|
| Appellant | … -Vs- Maa Ganga Modern Husking Rice Mill Private Ltd. Ors … Respondents |
| Mr. Nimish Mishra, Learned Counsel with Ms. Moumita Ghosh & Ms. Sanjana Sinha, Learned Counsel for Appellant |
|
| Mr. Proshit Deb, Learned Counsel Mr. P. Bose, Learned Counsel for the Respondent |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Mr. Proshit Deb, Learned Counsel has put his appearance for the Respondent. He prays for and granted two week’s time to file the objections.
List on 27th September, 2022 for hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 20th September, 2022 01/tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda & Anr
- respondent
Maa Ganga Modern Husking Rice Mill Private Ltd. Ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court