The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the first appeal as infructuous, noting that the related appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal had already been disposed of.
The appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 95/2022
Between Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. …Appellant/s V/s. Candour Industries & Ors. …Respondent/s M. Shah, i/b M/s. Intralegal, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Shubham Dubey, i/b Ms Mumtaz Khan, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 16/11/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submitted that the S.A. No. 116/2021 on the files of D.R.T – II, Ahmedabad stands disposed of, rendering this appeal infructuous.
Hence, the appeal is disposed of as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-14
1
Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.
Candour Industries & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
