Dr. Jagdish Sharma v. Indian Bank and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for amendment of appeal memorandum to add an additional respondent in Appeal No. 41/2013 before DRT, Mumbai, was allowed and posted for hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 480/2022 (Amendment)
In
Appeal No. 41/2013
Between
Dr Jagdish Sharma …Appellant/s V/s. Indian Bank and Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Jay Pandit, i/b Mr Prashant Pandit, Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Shobha Chavan, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondents
-: Order dated: 16/11/2022:-
I.A. No. 480/2022 this is an application for amendment of the appeal memorandum adding an additional Respondent to the party array.
The application is allowed to carry out amendment within two weeks.
Post on 09.12.2022 for hearing before the Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr Jagdish Sharma
- respondent
Indian Bank and Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court