The Appellant stated Respondents 2 and 3 could not be served. The Bench ordered service of them by publication and listed the matter before the Registrar on 01.07.2022 to complete service.
Direction to serve Respondents 2 and 3 by publication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 72/2020 Arising out of O.A. No. 225/2015 (DRT-II, Delhi)
Ram Niwas Jalan Vs ICICI Bank Ltd. & Ors.
22.04.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Amit Dhall, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma, Ld. counsel for the Respondent no. 1. None for the Respondent no. 2 and 3.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. counsel for the appellant states that Respondent no. 2 and 3 could not
be served.
Let Respondent no. 2 and 3 be served by way of publication for the next date of hearing.
List the matter before Ld. Registrar on 01.07.2022 for completion of service and put up before the Bench thereafter.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ashok
Ram Niwas Jalan
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Respondent no. 2
Respondent no. 3
Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Ashok
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
