In a miscellaneous appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, the appeal was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant despite repeated calls, with only the respondent's counsel present via video conference.
The appeal was dismissed in default due to the non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.49/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.55/2022 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Sugra Begum Vs Hero Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.
14.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None.
Mr. Vikrant Dabas, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of appellant despite repeated calls. Hence,
the present appeal is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Sugra Begum
Hero Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
