This order grants time to the appellant to file a rejoinder and lists a future post for a hearing, directing that the status quo continues.
Time granted for filing rejoinder; heard on specified future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 44/2022
Between
Union Bank of India … Appellant/s
V/s.
Dimple Arcade Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd. …Respondent/s & Ors.
Mr Hardeep Singh, i/b M/s. Clarus Legal, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Abhiraj Rao, i/b M/s. S. K. Singhi & Co. LLP for the Respondent No. 1
-: Order dated: 21/09/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks time to file a rejoinder on the reply which was filed by Respondent during the last hearing.
Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
Post on 28.10.2022 for rejoinder/hearing.
The status quo shall continue till then.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-23
1
Union Bank of India
Dimple Arcade Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
