Appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance by appellants despite direction for substitution of legal representatives. Adjacent miscellaneous applications dismissed as infructuous.
Misc. Appeal dismissed for default; other miscellaneous applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 42/2018
Between
Mr. Satyajit Balasaheb Kadam & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Laxmi Vilas Bank Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Merly Quadrus, i/b M/s. Indus Law, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 Bank.
-: Order dated : 28/06/2022 :-
The Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Bank is present and has also filed a submission regarding the first Respondent Bank merging with DSB Bank India Ltd.
Substitution Application has not been filed and the Appellants are not present for the last many hearings. On 02.05.2022 there was specific direction given to the Appellants to take steps for substitution but still there is no appearance for the Appellants.
Hence, the Misc. Appeal stands dismissed for default.
All other Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-28
1
Mr. Satyajit Balasaheb Kadam & Anr.
The Laxmi Vilas Bank Ltd & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
