The Tribunal adjourned the matter for supply of documents and fixation of dates for filing rejoinders and final arguments, without addressing substantive relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 391/2019 Arising out of S.A. No. 141/2019 (DRT, Jaipur)
UCO Bank Vs
World Trade Park Ltd. & Ors.
11.04.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Rajesh Rattan, Ld. counsel for appellant
Mr. Kirti Kapoor, Ld. counsel for respondents 1 to 3
Ms. Tanisha Khubchandani, Ld. counsel for respondents 4 and 5
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for respondents 1 to 3 states that he has not been supplied with the copy of the rejoinder. Let the same be furnished to him within two weeks from today.
Learned counsel for appellant seeks time to rejoinder to the reply of respondents 4 and 5. Let rejoinder be filed within four weeks.
List for 02.12.2022 for final arguments.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether time should be granted for filing the rejoinder to the reply of respondents 4 and 5.
Whether the copy of the rejoinder should be furnished to counsel for respondents 1 to 3.
UCO Bank
World Trade Park Ltd.
Ors.
Respondents 4 and 5
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
