A clerical error in an order regarding the next hearing date was corrected by the court, listing the matter for final arguments on a future date. The interim order was continued.
None. The hearing date was corrected and the matter listed for final arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 384/2017 Arising out of S.A. No.83/2017 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Parmod Kumari Vs Authorised Officer State Bank of India and Ors.
22.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Vipan Dutta, Ld. counsel for respondents 1 & 2
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
In the order dated 26.04.2022 uploaded on the website the next date inadevertenty has been shown as 30.12.2022 instead of today’s date. The said date of 30.12.2022 is, therefore, cancelled.
List the matter now for final arguments on 17.02.2023.
Interim order to continue.
Learned counsel for the appellant be informed accordingly.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Parmod Kumari
Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
