Direction issued to appellants to serve respondents for settlement or withdrawal of appeal post 29.04.2022. Admission not closed as respondents unserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No.37/2017
Between
Mr. Shaukat Ali Sayyed & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Rushshab Chopra, i/b M/s Vidhi Partners, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated : 19/04/2022 :-
Ld. Counsel appearing for Appellants submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and seeks time to take steps regarding withdrawal of the Appeal
It is seen that Respondents have not been served.
Appellants are directed to complete service on Respondents, if settlement is not taking place.
Post on 29.04.2022 for completing service / withdrawal of the Appeal.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-1
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be granted for withdrawal of appeal after settlement.
Shaukat Ali Sayyed & Ors.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
