Appellants sought to withdraw an appeal before the DRT, Mumbai. The chairperson permitted withdrawal and dismissed remaining miscellaneous applications as infructuous.
Withdrawal of the Miscellaneous Appeal permitted. Miscellaneous Applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 37/2017
Between
Mr. Shaukat Ali Sayyed & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Rushabh Chopra, i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated : 29/04/2022 :-
Learned counsel for Appellants has filed Purshish seeking withdrawal of the Misc. Appeal.
There is no representation for Respondents.
In view of above, Appellants are permitted to withdraw the
Misc. Appeal and the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-1
1
Mr. Shaukat Ali Sayyed & Ors.
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
