A single-paragraph order by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai adjourning an appeal for compliance of an application seeking substitution of the appellant with the Resolution Professional pending objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 30/2019
Between
Neesa Leisure Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd. …Respondent/s
Mr. Tiwari, i/b Mr. Santosh Thakur, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Arjun Makuny, i/b M/s. Meraki Chabers, Advocate, submitted that he is representing Respondent and undertakes to file Vakalatnama on or before the next date of hearing.
Mr. Zaid Mansur, i/b M/s. DSK Legal, Advocate, submitted that he is representing Proposed Appellant.
-: Order dated : 08/04/2022 :-
Learned counsel for proposed Appellant submits that he has filed an application seeking substitution of Appellant with Mr. Amit Jain, Resolution Professional of Neesa Leisure Ltd. and the same is under objection.
At request of learned counsel for proposed Appellant, post on 12.04.2022 before Registrar for compliance.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-12
1
Neesa Leisure Ltd.
Assets Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
