Prakash Manjunath Pai v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Misc. Appeal heard regarding an application by the appellant for time to file a substitution of Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank due to merger; matter posted for steps.
Misc. Appeal heard regarding an application by the appellant for time to file a substitution of Syndicate Bank with Canara Bank due to merger; matter posted for steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc Appeal No. 297/2008
Between
Mr. Prakash Manjunath Pai … Appellant/s V/s. Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Daison David, i/b M/s. P. D. Jain & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AKS Legal Consultant, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 2.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that Syndicate Bank has merged into Canara Bank. Hence, an application for substitution needs to be filed. The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant seeks time for the same.
Steps shall be taken expeditiously.
Post on 24.11.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-25
1
Prakash Manjunath Pai
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court