In Misc. Appeal No. 278/2009, the Tribunal directed the appellant to substitute the respondent bank as the latter had merged with Union Bank of India.
Direction to appellant to substitute Respondent No.1 (Andhra Bank) with Union Bank of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Misc. Appeal No. 278/2009
Between
Mr Karunamoy Krishnachand Chakravarty … Appellant/s V/s. Andhra Bank & Ors. … Respondent/s
Mr Minesh K. Shah, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Mittal Shroff along with Mr Digamber Gaikwad, i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr Madhur Rai, Advocate for Auction Purchaser (Mr Sanjay Rane)
-: Order dated: 25/08/2022:-
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1, Andhra Bank, submitted a Pursis informing that the Bank has merged with Union Bank of India.
The Appellant is, therefore, directed to take immediate steps to substitute the Respondent Bank with the later Bank.
Post on 26.09.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-19
1
Mr Karunamoy Krishnachand Chakravarty
Andhra Bank & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
