In this miscellaneous appeal arising from an OA before the DRT-I, Chandigarh, the debt recovery appellate tribunal addressed an interim application for early hearing where the respondent failed to appear.
Issue of fresh notice to respondents and counsel Mr. H.P. Singh by all permissible modes for hearing on 15.12.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.218/2022 Arising out of O.A. No. 184/2006 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
Sh. Vinod Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation & Anr.
13.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Aditya Dhawan, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
None.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
I.A. No. 825/2022
This is an application filed by the appellant for early hearing.
None has appeared on behalf of respondent FI despite repeated calls. Ld. Counsel for appellant states that they have served the notice upon respondent FI and next date of hearing in O.A. No. 184/2006 before Ld. DRT-I, Chandigarh is 19.12.2022.
Ld. Counsel for appellant prays that they may be allow to serve again the notice to the respondent FI as well as Ld. Counsel Mr. H.P. Singh.
Issue a fresh notice to the respondents as well as Ld. Counsel Mr. H.P. Singh by all permissible modes (including by post and Dasti) for 15.12.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Vinod Kumar
Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation & Anr.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
23 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
