S Thangaprabhu v. Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A.(S.A):3/2022
S.Thangaprabhu & Anr ... Appellants
Vs
A.O.,Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
... Respondents
31/05/2022
Representing counsel Shri M. Karthik for Ld. Counsel M/s Ramalingam & Associates for appellants and representing counsel Shir S. Vignesh for Ld. Counsel Shri V. Chandrasekaran for R1 and R2 are present.
Ld. Counsel for respondents filed a Memo stating that as auction sale could not be concluded, impugned sale notice has become infructuous and nothing survives in the present appeal.
Ld. Counsel for appellants sought for time.
At request of Ld. Counsel for appellants, list the matter on 3.6.2022 for further proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Thangaprabhu & Anr
- respondent
A.O., Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court