In a debt recovery appeal, the applicant argued the appeal became infructuous due to no sale, while appellants claimed the cause survives pending main SA. The matter was adjourned for last-chance arguments.
Appeal adjourned to 16.08.2022 for final arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A(S.A):3/2022
S.Thangaprabhu & Anr V/S A.O.,Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
08/07/2022
Advocate for R1 & R2 represented that nothing survives in this appeal and appeal has become infructous since no sale took place in pursuance of sale notice.
Advocate for appellants submitted that as main SA is pending, cause survives and sought time for arguments.
At request of Ld. Counsel for appellants, posted to 16.8.2022 for arguments as last chance.
Sd/Chairperson
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the cause of action survives when the main sale action is pending.
Whether the appeal should be adjourned for arguments given the pending main suit.
S. Thangaprabhu & Anr
A.O., Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd & Anr
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
