State Bank of India v. Chandra Thermoforming Industry
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal for adjournment dismissed due to closed reply right. Hearing listed for 01.03.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Appeal No. 07/2022 Date: 25.11.2022
State Bank of India Vs. M/s Chandra Thermoforming Industry
Present: Shri Avinash Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the applicant, Shri Alok Rai, counsel for the respondent,
The office report dated 24.11.2022 shows that inspite of eight opportunities being granted to the respondent, no reply has been filed. Accordingly, right of the respondent to file reply is hereby closed.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri Sandeep Arora is out of station, therefore, he is unable to attend this Tribunal today and he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 01.03.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
State Bank of India
M/s Chandra Thermoforming Industry
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court