An appeal challenging a prior decision was dismissed as having become infructuous because the single applicant judge noted that the Special Address had finally been decided by the lower court on 29.09.2022. No substantive legal principles were applied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Appeal No. 03/2022 Date: 12.12.2022
State Bank of India Vs. Ananya Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Present: Shri Jitendra Sarin, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri N. K. Dwivedi, counsel for the respondent,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the present appeal has become infructuous, as the S.A. has finally been decided by the Tribunal below vide judgment and order dated 29.09.2022.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
State Bank of India
Ananya Agro Tech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
