Sunil kumar Agrawal v. Canara bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Due to the retirement of the Learned Presiding Officer, the Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Misc.Appeal No. 01 of 2020 Diary No. 11132 of 2018) (Arising out of S.A. 222 of 2018 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
| 15.6.2022 | Sunil Kumar Aga -Vs- Canara Bank |
rwal … Ap … Res |
pellant pondent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Nemani S Counsel for Appe |
rinivas, llants |
Learned | |
| Ms. Aparajita Counsel for Resp |
Rao, ondent |
Learned |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the record. Since the Learned Presiding Officer has retired, the appeal becomes infructuous.
Accordingly, the appeal, being Misc. Appeal No. 01 of 2020, is dismissed as infructuous.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th June, 2022 08/ac
Sunil Kumar Aga
Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court